by continuing to kick this topic around, we can use previous conclusions as stepping stones to new ones. the key to good concluding is really to keep up your momentum, i think...
Hodgson wrote:Under arrest.
oh yeah? well the joke's on you, copper, because i've had 'awesomest' in my sig since jheri curls used to get me girls!! ahahahaha!!!
ATTICA!!! ATTICA!!!!
A monkey riding a dog is probably the awesomest thing that could ever happen.
Contributors wanted! Fantastic Horror — Original Works of Disturbing Imagination
Ah so you all shall have fun with me on this subject. I pretty much enjoy others correcting my grammar BUT I'm pretty that could be used on another thread.
And back to the subject a bunch of pages ago, I really don't care if he was racist, sexist or any ist. The fact of the matter is he was a great writer and that is that.
A great writer is a great writer because of one of, or preferably both, of two closely interconnected things: his style, and his ideas. You can't seperate a person's ideas from who they are. Personally, I think that if Lovecraft had been a tolerant, humanist, non-mysoginist, sexual, PC-in a modern way (And I wish everyone would stop yelling at him for using the "n-word" That WAS the politically correct word in his day!) person, than his writing wouldn't have been any good at all. His own personal streaks of hatred and misanthropy, as well as his Angliphilia and reactionary views, give the enduring flavor to much of his writings. And we supposedly open-minded moderns could learn a lot by trying to understand and tolerate such opinions instead of yelling "bigot" and throwing them away.